Iceland vs Latvia: End-of-life care — Deaths in hospital

Iceland
64.4 Percentage of deaths
in 2024
Latvia
48 Percentage of deaths
in 2023
Iceland rank
2nd
Latvia rank
3rd

End-of-life care — Deaths in hospital over time

  • Iceland
  • Latvia
0204060200020122024

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 64.4 Percentage of deaths against 48 Percentage of deaths in Latvia, a difference of 16.4 Percentage of deaths.

That makes Iceland's figure about 1.3 times Latvia's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.

Iceland ranks 2nd and Latvia ranks 3rd of 18 countries.

Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Latvia Difference Ahead
2000s 53.37 Percentage of deaths 40.87 Percentage of deaths 12.5 Percentage of deaths Iceland
2010s 56.96 Percentage of deaths 43.45 Percentage of deaths 13.51 Percentage of deaths Iceland
2020s 63.62 Percentage of deaths 46.95 Percentage of deaths 16.67 Percentage of deaths Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher end-of-life care — deaths in hospital, Iceland or Latvia?
Iceland, at 64.4 Percentage of deaths against 48 Percentage of deaths in Latvia as of 2024.
What is the difference in end-of-life care — deaths in hospital between Iceland and Latvia?
16.4 Percentage of deaths, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Latvia?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Iceland and Latvia rank globally for end-of-life care — deaths in hospital?
Iceland ranks 2nd and Latvia ranks 3rd of 18 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as End-of-life care — Deaths in hospital. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Latvia: End-of-life care — Deaths in hospital. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/end-of-life-care-deaths-in-hospital/iceland/latvia-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/end-of-life-care-deaths-in-hospital/iceland/latvia-2/">Iceland vs Latvia: End-of-life care — Deaths in hospital</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
End-of-life care — Deaths in hospital
Unit
Percentage of deaths
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
26 places, 340 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

End of Life Care (EC) is a subgroup of indicators within the HCQO database and provides data on the quality of care provided to people who are near the end of life. End of life care is a key indicator of healthcare quality, as high rates of hospital or acute care deaths, and frequent unplanned hospital readmissions in the final months of life may reflect gaps in access to and adequacy of community-based or palliative care. The database includes indicators on deaths occurring in inpatient acute care and hospital settings, and on the proportion of patients with unplanned readmissions during the last 30 or 180 days of life. These indicators focus on individuals who die due to conditions such as cancer, cardiovascular disease, chronic respiratory disease, and dementia. Indicators are reported as crude rates. For further information, please consult: The HCQO Definitions document provides indicator definitions and calculation methodologies of HCQO indicators The Sources and Methods survey on End of Life Care (EC) provides detailed country-specific information The OECD’s Health System Performance Assessment (HSPA) Framework outlines how HCQO indicators relate to the OECD’s HSPA domains of Access, Quality and People’s needs and preferences