Cuba vs Marshall Islands: ENAP target met stillbirth rate
Cuba
8.44
in 2030
Marshall Islands
8.81
in 2030
Cuba rank
78th
Marshall Islands rank
77th
ENAP target met stillbirth rate over time
- Cuba
- Marshall Islands
How they compare
Marshall Islands currently reports 8.81 against 8.44 in Cuba, a difference of 0.37.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Marshall Islands has been ahead every year.
Cuba ranks 78th and Marshall Islands ranks 77th of 200 countries.
Marshall Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Marshall Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020s | 8.71 | 9.38 | 0.6645 | Marshall Islands |
| 2030s | 8.44 | 8.81 | 0.3642 | Marshall Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enap target met stillbirth rate, Cuba or Marshall Islands?
- Marshall Islands, at 8.81 against 8.44 in Cuba as of 2030.
- What is the difference in enap target met stillbirth rate between Cuba and Marshall Islands?
- 0.37, with Marshall Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Marshall Islands?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2024 to 2030.
- How do Cuba and Marshall Islands rank globally for enap target met stillbirth rate?
- Cuba ranks 78th and Marshall Islands ranks 77th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as ENAP target met stillbirth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.