Brunei vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Domestic general government health expenditure
Brunei
7.0%
in 2023
Saint Kitts and Nevis
7.2%
in 2023
Brunei rank
143rd
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
140th
Domestic general government health expenditure over time
- Brunei
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 7.2% against 7.0% in Brunei, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
Brunei ranks 143rd and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 140th of 193 countries.
Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brunei | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 6.1% | 6.3% | 0.2% | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2010s | 5.9% | 7.1% | 1.2% | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2020s | 6.7% | 7.5% | 0.8% | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher domestic general government health expenditure, Brunei or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 7.2% against 7.0% in Brunei as of 2023.
- What is the difference in domestic general government health expenditure between Brunei and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0.2%, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brunei and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Brunei and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for domestic general government health expenditure?
- Brunei ranks 143rd and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 140th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Health Expenditure Database, updated December 12th, 2025, World Health Organization (WHO), published as Domestic general government health expenditure (% of general government expenditure). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Public expenditure on health from domestic sources as a share of total public expenditure. It indicates the priority of the government to spend on health from own domestic public resources.