Antigua and Barbuda vs Lithuania: Domestic general government health expenditure
Antigua and Barbuda
12.3%
in 2023
Lithuania
12.7%
in 2023
Antigua and Barbuda rank
69th
Lithuania rank
67th
Domestic general government health expenditure over time
- Antigua and Barbuda
- Lithuania
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 12.7% against 12.3% in Antigua and Barbuda, a difference of 0.4%.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 69th and Lithuania ranks 67th of 193 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Antigua and Barbuda averaged higher in 2 and Lithuania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Antigua and Barbuda | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 10.2% | 11.3% | 1.1% | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 12.9% | 12.1% | 0.9% | Antigua and Barbuda |
| 2020s | 13.2% | 12.9% | 0.3% | Antigua and Barbuda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher domestic general government health expenditure, Antigua and Barbuda or Lithuania?
- Lithuania, at 12.7% against 12.3% in Antigua and Barbuda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in domestic general government health expenditure between Antigua and Barbuda and Lithuania?
- 0.4%, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Lithuania?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Antigua and Barbuda and Lithuania rank globally for domestic general government health expenditure?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 69th and Lithuania ranks 67th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Health Expenditure Database, updated December 12th, 2025, World Health Organization (WHO), published as Domestic general government health expenditure (% of general government expenditure). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Public expenditure on health from domestic sources as a share of total public expenditure. It indicates the priority of the government to spend on health from own domestic public resources.