Nauru vs OECD members: Domestic general government health expenditure
Domestic general government health expenditure over time
- Nauru
- OECD members
How they compare
Nauru currently reports 83.6% against 62.6% in OECD members, a difference of 21.0%.
That makes Nauru's figure about 1.3 times OECD members's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Nauru ahead.
Nauru ranks 12th and OECD members ranks 13th of 193 countries.
Nauru has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nauru | OECD members | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 73.8% | 60.2% | 13.6% | Nauru |
| 2010s | 69.6% | 62.4% | 7.1% | Nauru |
| 2020s | 85.7% | 64.5% | 21.2% | Nauru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher domestic general government health expenditure, Nauru or OECD members?
- Nauru, at 83.6% against 62.6% in OECD members as of 2023.
- What is the difference in domestic general government health expenditure between Nauru and OECD members?
- 21.0%, with Nauru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nauru and OECD members?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Nauru and OECD members rank globally for domestic general government health expenditure?
- Nauru ranks 12th and OECD members ranks 13th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Health Expenditure Database, updated December 12th, 2025, World Health Organization (WHO), published as Domestic general government health expenditure (% of current health expenditure). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Share of current health expenditures funded from domestic public sources for health. Domestic public sources include domestic revenue as internal transfers and grants, transfers, subsidies to voluntary health insurance beneficiaries, non-profit institutions serving households (NPISH) or enterprise financing schemes as well as compulsory prepayment and social health insurance contributions. They do not include external resources spent by governments on health.