Mauritania vs Sri Lanka: Domestic general government health expenditure
Domestic general government health expenditure over time
- Mauritania
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Mauritania currently reports 34.2% against 33.6% in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.6%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Mauritania ranks 145th and Sri Lanka ranks 148th of 193 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritania | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 22.3% | 50.3% | 28.1% | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 34.5% | 43.6% | 9.1% | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 35.9% | 41.5% | 5.5% | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher domestic general government health expenditure, Mauritania or Sri Lanka?
- Mauritania, at 34.2% against 33.6% in Sri Lanka as of 2023.
- What is the difference in domestic general government health expenditure between Mauritania and Sri Lanka?
- 0.6%, with Mauritania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Sri Lanka?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Mauritania and Sri Lanka rank globally for domestic general government health expenditure?
- Mauritania ranks 145th and Sri Lanka ranks 148th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Health Expenditure Database, updated December 12th, 2025, World Health Organization (WHO), published as Domestic general government health expenditure (% of current health expenditure). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Share of current health expenditures funded from domestic public sources for health. Domestic public sources include domestic revenue as internal transfers and grants, transfers, subsidies to voluntary health insurance beneficiaries, non-profit institutions serving households (NPISH) or enterprise financing schemes as well as compulsory prepayment and social health insurance contributions. They do not include external resources spent by governments on health.