Madagascar vs Tanzania: Domestic general government health expenditure
Domestic general government health expenditure over time
- Madagascar
- Tanzania
How they compare
Tanzania currently reports 31.7% against 28.8% in Madagascar, a difference of 2.9%.
That makes Tanzania's figure about 1.1 times Madagascar's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Madagascar ahead.
Madagascar ranks 159th and Tanzania ranks 156th of 193 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Madagascar averaged higher in 2 and Tanzania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Madagascar | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 39.1% | 30.4% | 8.7% | Madagascar |
| 2010s | 37.7% | 32.4% | 5.3% | Madagascar |
| 2020s | 24.2% | 29.6% | 5.4% | Tanzania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher domestic general government health expenditure, Madagascar or Tanzania?
- Tanzania, at 31.7% against 28.8% in Madagascar as of 2023.
- What is the difference in domestic general government health expenditure between Madagascar and Tanzania?
- 2.9%, with Tanzania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and Tanzania?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Madagascar and Tanzania rank globally for domestic general government health expenditure?
- Madagascar ranks 159th and Tanzania ranks 156th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Health Expenditure Database, updated December 12th, 2025, World Health Organization (WHO), published as Domestic general government health expenditure (% of current health expenditure). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Share of current health expenditures funded from domestic public sources for health. Domestic public sources include domestic revenue as internal transfers and grants, transfers, subsidies to voluntary health insurance beneficiaries, non-profit institutions serving households (NPISH) or enterprise financing schemes as well as compulsory prepayment and social health insurance contributions. They do not include external resources spent by governments on health.