Low & middle income vs Poland: Domestic general government health expenditure
Domestic general government health expenditure over time
- Low & middle income
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 77.1% against 52.9% in Low & middle income, a difference of 24.2%.
That makes Poland's figure about 1.5 times Low & middle income's.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.
Low & middle income ranks 25th and Poland ranks 28th of 47 groups.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Low & middle income | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 41.6% | 69.5% | 27.9% | Poland |
| 2010s | 50.8% | 70.2% | 19.4% | Poland |
| 2020s | 52.6% | 73.7% | 21.1% | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher domestic general government health expenditure, Low & middle income or Poland?
- Poland, at 77.1% against 52.9% in Low & middle income as of 2023.
- What is the difference in domestic general government health expenditure between Low & middle income and Poland?
- 24.2%, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Low & middle income and Poland?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Low & middle income and Poland rank globally for domestic general government health expenditure?
- Low & middle income ranks 25th and Poland ranks 28th of 47 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Health Expenditure Database, updated December 12th, 2025, World Health Organization (WHO), published as Domestic general government health expenditure (% of current health expenditure). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Share of current health expenditures funded from domestic public sources for health. Domestic public sources include domestic revenue as internal transfers and grants, transfers, subsidies to voluntary health insurance beneficiaries, non-profit institutions serving households (NPISH) or enterprise financing schemes as well as compulsory prepayment and social health insurance contributions. They do not include external resources spent by governments on health.