Liechtenstein vs Montenegro: Domestic general government health expenditure
Domestic general government health expenditure over time
- Liechtenstein
- Montenegro
How they compare
Montenegro currently reports 69.3% against 69.0% in Liechtenstein, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Liechtenstein ahead.
Liechtenstein ranks 57th and Montenegro ranks 54th of 193 countries.
Liechtenstein has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Liechtenstein | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 65.0% | 59.5% | 5.5% | Liechtenstein |
| 2020s | 68.5% | 66.0% | 2.5% | Liechtenstein |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher domestic general government health expenditure, Liechtenstein or Montenegro?
- Montenegro, at 69.3% against 69.0% in Liechtenstein as of 2023.
- What is the difference in domestic general government health expenditure between Liechtenstein and Montenegro?
- 0.3%, with Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Liechtenstein and Montenegro?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2023.
- How do Liechtenstein and Montenegro rank globally for domestic general government health expenditure?
- Liechtenstein ranks 57th and Montenegro ranks 54th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Health Expenditure Database, updated December 12th, 2025, World Health Organization (WHO), published as Domestic general government health expenditure (% of current health expenditure). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Share of current health expenditures funded from domestic public sources for health. Domestic public sources include domestic revenue as internal transfers and grants, transfers, subsidies to voluntary health insurance beneficiaries, non-profit institutions serving households (NPISH) or enterprise financing schemes as well as compulsory prepayment and social health insurance contributions. They do not include external resources spent by governments on health.