Kyrgyzstan vs United States: Domestic general government health expenditure
Domestic general government health expenditure over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- United States
How they compare
United States currently reports 54.0% against 53.3% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.7%.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 104th and United States ranks 102nd of 193 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 1 and United States in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | United States | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 46.1% | 46.0% | 0.2% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2010s | 45.1% | 50.5% | 5.4% | United States |
| 2020s | 51.5% | 55.4% | 3.9% | United States |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher domestic general government health expenditure, Kyrgyzstan or United States?
- United States, at 54.0% against 53.3% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in domestic general government health expenditure between Kyrgyzstan and United States?
- 0.7%, with United States ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and United States?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and United States rank globally for domestic general government health expenditure?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 104th and United States ranks 102nd of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Health Expenditure Database, updated December 12th, 2025, World Health Organization (WHO), published as Domestic general government health expenditure (% of current health expenditure). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Share of current health expenditures funded from domestic public sources for health. Domestic public sources include domestic revenue as internal transfers and grants, transfers, subsidies to voluntary health insurance beneficiaries, non-profit institutions serving households (NPISH) or enterprise financing schemes as well as compulsory prepayment and social health insurance contributions. They do not include external resources spent by governments on health.