Equatorial Guinea vs Zimbabwe: Domestic general government health expenditure
Domestic general government health expenditure over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 32.4% against 32.3% in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 152nd and Zimbabwe ranks 151st of 193 countries.
Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 32.8% | 25.7% | 7.2% | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2020s | 30.8% | 29.3% | 1.5% | Equatorial Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher domestic general government health expenditure, Equatorial Guinea or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 32.4% against 32.3% in Equatorial Guinea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in domestic general government health expenditure between Equatorial Guinea and Zimbabwe?
- 0.1%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Zimbabwe?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Zimbabwe rank globally for domestic general government health expenditure?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 152nd and Zimbabwe ranks 151st of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Health Expenditure Database, updated December 12th, 2025, World Health Organization (WHO), published as Domestic general government health expenditure (% of current health expenditure). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Share of current health expenditures funded from domestic public sources for health. Domestic public sources include domestic revenue as internal transfers and grants, transfers, subsidies to voluntary health insurance beneficiaries, non-profit institutions serving households (NPISH) or enterprise financing schemes as well as compulsory prepayment and social health insurance contributions. They do not include external resources spent by governments on health.