Equatorial Guinea vs Switzerland: Domestic general government health expenditure
Domestic general government health expenditure over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Switzerland
How they compare
Switzerland currently reports 33.1% against 32.3% in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.8%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 152nd and Switzerland ranks 149th of 193 countries.
Switzerland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Switzerland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 30.2% | 30.8% | 0.6% | Switzerland |
| 2010s | 32.8% | 33.6% | 0.8% | Switzerland |
| 2020s | 30.8% | 34.8% | 4.0% | Switzerland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher domestic general government health expenditure, Equatorial Guinea or Switzerland?
- Switzerland, at 33.1% against 32.3% in Equatorial Guinea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in domestic general government health expenditure between Equatorial Guinea and Switzerland?
- 0.8%, with Switzerland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Switzerland?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Switzerland rank globally for domestic general government health expenditure?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 152nd and Switzerland ranks 149th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Health Expenditure Database, updated December 12th, 2025, World Health Organization (WHO), published as Domestic general government health expenditure (% of current health expenditure). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Share of current health expenditures funded from domestic public sources for health. Domestic public sources include domestic revenue as internal transfers and grants, transfers, subsidies to voluntary health insurance beneficiaries, non-profit institutions serving households (NPISH) or enterprise financing schemes as well as compulsory prepayment and social health insurance contributions. They do not include external resources spent by governments on health.