Ecuador vs Solomon Islands: Domestic general government health expenditure
Domestic general government health expenditure over time
- Ecuador
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Solomon Islands currently reports 62.9% against 62.0% in Ecuador, a difference of 0.9%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Solomon Islands ahead.
Ecuador ranks 81st and Solomon Islands ranks 78th of 193 countries.
Solomon Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Solomon Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 33.5% | 68.7% | 35.2% | Solomon Islands |
| 2010s | 57.2% | 66.5% | 9.3% | Solomon Islands |
| 2020s | 62.2% | 68.9% | 6.7% | Solomon Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher domestic general government health expenditure, Ecuador or Solomon Islands?
- Solomon Islands, at 62.9% against 62.0% in Ecuador as of 2023.
- What is the difference in domestic general government health expenditure between Ecuador and Solomon Islands?
- 0.9%, with Solomon Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Solomon Islands?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Ecuador and Solomon Islands rank globally for domestic general government health expenditure?
- Ecuador ranks 81st and Solomon Islands ranks 78th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Health Expenditure Database, updated December 12th, 2025, World Health Organization (WHO), published as Domestic general government health expenditure (% of current health expenditure). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Share of current health expenditures funded from domestic public sources for health. Domestic public sources include domestic revenue as internal transfers and grants, transfers, subsidies to voluntary health insurance beneficiaries, non-profit institutions serving households (NPISH) or enterprise financing schemes as well as compulsory prepayment and social health insurance contributions. They do not include external resources spent by governments on health.