Cape Verde vs North Macedonia: Domestic general government health expenditure
Domestic general government health expenditure over time
- Cape Verde
- North Macedonia
How they compare
Cape Verde currently reports 58.6% against 57.6% in North Macedonia, a difference of 1.0%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Cape Verde ahead.
Cape Verde ranks 90th and North Macedonia ranks 93rd of 193 countries.
Cape Verde has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 70.8% | 57.4% | 13.4% | Cape Verde |
| 2010s | 62.3% | 62.0% | 0.3% | Cape Verde |
| 2020s | 64.0% | 57.3% | 6.7% | Cape Verde |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher domestic general government health expenditure, Cape Verde or North Macedonia?
- Cape Verde, at 58.6% against 57.6% in North Macedonia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in domestic general government health expenditure between Cape Verde and North Macedonia?
- 1.0%, with Cape Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and North Macedonia?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Cape Verde and North Macedonia rank globally for domestic general government health expenditure?
- Cape Verde ranks 90th and North Macedonia ranks 93rd of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Health Expenditure Database, updated December 12th, 2025, World Health Organization (WHO), published as Domestic general government health expenditure (% of current health expenditure). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Share of current health expenditures funded from domestic public sources for health. Domestic public sources include domestic revenue as internal transfers and grants, transfers, subsidies to voluntary health insurance beneficiaries, non-profit institutions serving households (NPISH) or enterprise financing schemes as well as compulsory prepayment and social health insurance contributions. They do not include external resources spent by governments on health.