Botswana vs Marshall Islands: Domestic general government health expenditure
Domestic general government health expenditure over time
- Botswana
- Marshall Islands
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 75.5% against 75.0% in Marshall Islands, a difference of 0.5%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Marshall Islands ahead.
Botswana ranks 35th and Marshall Islands ranks 36th of 193 countries.
Botswana has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Marshall Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 55.9% | 44.7% | 11.2% | Botswana |
| 2010s | 66.5% | 42.6% | 23.9% | Botswana |
| 2020s | 75.1% | 50.8% | 24.4% | Botswana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher domestic general government health expenditure, Botswana or Marshall Islands?
- Botswana, at 75.5% against 75.0% in Marshall Islands as of 2023.
- What is the difference in domestic general government health expenditure between Botswana and Marshall Islands?
- 0.5%, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Marshall Islands?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Botswana and Marshall Islands rank globally for domestic general government health expenditure?
- Botswana ranks 35th and Marshall Islands ranks 36th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Health Expenditure Database, updated December 12th, 2025, World Health Organization (WHO), published as Domestic general government health expenditure (% of current health expenditure). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Share of current health expenditures funded from domestic public sources for health. Domestic public sources include domestic revenue as internal transfers and grants, transfers, subsidies to voluntary health insurance beneficiaries, non-profit institutions serving households (NPISH) or enterprise financing schemes as well as compulsory prepayment and social health insurance contributions. They do not include external resources spent by governments on health.