Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Kuwait: Domestic general government health expenditure per capita, PPP

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
45.86 current international $
in 2023
Kuwait
2,273 current international $
in 2023
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank
44th
Kuwait rank
42nd

Domestic general government health expenditure per capita, PPP over time

  • Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
  • Kuwait
05001.0k1.5k2.0k2.5k200020112023

How they compare

Kuwait currently reports 2,273 current international $ against 45.86 current international $ in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), a difference of 2,227 current international $.

That makes Kuwait's figure about 49.6 times Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)'s.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Kuwait has been ahead every year.

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 44th and Kuwait ranks 42nd of 47 groups.

Kuwait has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) Kuwait Difference Ahead
2000s 20.84 current international $ 1,373 current international $ 1,352 current international $ Kuwait
2010s 31.46 current international $ 1,797 current international $ 1,765 current international $ Kuwait
2020s 46.36 current international $ 2,239 current international $ 2,192 current international $ Kuwait

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher domestic general government health expenditure per capita, ppp, Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) or Kuwait?
Kuwait, at 2,273 current international $ against 45.86 current international $ in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) as of 2023.
What is the difference in domestic general government health expenditure per capita, ppp between Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Kuwait?
2,227 current international $, with Kuwait ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Kuwait?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Kuwait rank globally for domestic general government health expenditure per capita, ppp?
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 44th and Kuwait ranks 42nd of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Global Health Expenditure Database, updated December 12th, 2025, World Health Organization (WHO), published as Domestic general government health expenditure per capita, PPP (current international $). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Kuwait: Domestic general government health expenditure per capita, PPP. Statizoid, drawing on Global Health Expenditure Database, updated December 12th, 2025, World Health Organization (WHO). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/domestic-general-government-health-expenditure-per-capita-ppp-current-international/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/kuwait/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/domestic-general-government-health-expenditure-per-capita-ppp-current-international/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/kuwait/">Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Kuwait: Domestic general government health expenditure per capita, PPP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Domestic general government health expenditure per capita, PPP (current international $)
Unit
current international $
Source
Global Health Expenditure Database, updated December 12th, 2025, World Health Organization (WHO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
240 places, 5,674 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

Public expenditure on health from domestic sources per capita expressed in international dollars at purchasing power parity.