New Zealand vs San Marino: Diphtheria tetanus toxoid and pertussis third-dose (DTP3)
New Zealand
88.0%
in 2025
San Marino
88.0%
in 2025
New Zealand rank
112th
San Marino rank
112th
Diphtheria tetanus toxoid and pertussis third-dose (DTP3) over time
- New Zealand
- San Marino
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 88.0% against 88.0% in San Marino, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was San Marino ahead.
New Zealand ranks 112th and San Marino ranks 112th of 194 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, New Zealand averaged higher in 1 and San Marino in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | San Marino | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 89.6% | 94.2% | 4.6% | San Marino |
| 2010s | 92.9% | 87.8% | 5.1% | New Zealand |
| 2020s | 89.3% | 89.7% | 0.3% | San Marino |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher diphtheria tetanus toxoid and pertussis third-dose (dtp3), New Zealand or San Marino?
- New Zealand, at 88.0% against 88.0% in San Marino as of 2025.
- What is the difference in diphtheria tetanus toxoid and pertussis third-dose (dtp3) between New Zealand and San Marino?
- 0.0%, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and San Marino?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do New Zealand and San Marino rank globally for diphtheria tetanus toxoid and pertussis third-dose (dtp3)?
- New Zealand ranks 112th and San Marino ranks 112th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Diphtheria tetanus toxoid and pertussis third-dose (DTP3) immunization coverage among 1-year-olds (%) (WUENIC). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.