Republic of Moldova vs Namibia: Diphtheria tetanus toxoid and pertussis third-dose (DTP3)
Republic of Moldova
82.0%
in 2025
Namibia
82.0%
in 2025
Republic of Moldova rank
146th
Namibia rank
146th
Diphtheria tetanus toxoid and pertussis third-dose (DTP3) over time
- Republic of Moldova
- Namibia
How they compare
Republic of Moldova currently reports 82.0% against 82.0% in Namibia, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Republic of Moldova ahead.
Republic of Moldova ranks 146th and Namibia ranks 146th of 194 countries.
Republic of Moldova has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Republic of Moldova | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 94.7% | 81.8% | 12.9% | Republic of Moldova |
| 2010s | 90.3% | 86.7% | 3.6% | Republic of Moldova |
| 2020s | 86.0% | 85.0% | 1.0% | Republic of Moldova |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher diphtheria tetanus toxoid and pertussis third-dose (dtp3), Republic of Moldova or Namibia?
- Republic of Moldova, at 82.0% against 82.0% in Namibia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in diphtheria tetanus toxoid and pertussis third-dose (dtp3) between Republic of Moldova and Namibia?
- 0.0%, with Republic of Moldova ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Moldova and Namibia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Republic of Moldova and Namibia rank globally for diphtheria tetanus toxoid and pertussis third-dose (dtp3)?
- Republic of Moldova ranks 146th and Namibia ranks 146th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Diphtheria tetanus toxoid and pertussis third-dose (DTP3) immunization coverage among 1-year-olds (%) (WUENIC). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.