Malaysia vs Rwanda: Diphtheria tetanus toxoid and pertussis third-dose (DTP3)
Malaysia
95.0%
in 2025
Rwanda
95.0%
in 2025
Malaysia rank
59th
Rwanda rank
59th
Diphtheria tetanus toxoid and pertussis third-dose (DTP3) over time
- Malaysia
- Rwanda
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 95.0% against 95.0% in Rwanda, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Malaysia ahead.
Malaysia ranks 59th and Rwanda ranks 59th of 194 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Malaysia averaged higher in 2 and Rwanda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 96.1% | 92.5% | 3.6% | Malaysia |
| 2010s | 97.6% | 97.7% | 0.1% | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 95.5% | 94.0% | 1.5% | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher diphtheria tetanus toxoid and pertussis third-dose (dtp3), Malaysia or Rwanda?
- Malaysia, at 95.0% against 95.0% in Rwanda as of 2025.
- What is the difference in diphtheria tetanus toxoid and pertussis third-dose (dtp3) between Malaysia and Rwanda?
- 0.0%, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Rwanda?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Malaysia and Rwanda rank globally for diphtheria tetanus toxoid and pertussis third-dose (dtp3)?
- Malaysia ranks 59th and Rwanda ranks 59th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Diphtheria tetanus toxoid and pertussis third-dose (DTP3) immunization coverage among 1-year-olds (%) (WUENIC). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.