India vs Lao People's Democratic Republic: Diphtheria - number of reported cases, per square kilometre

India
0.0013 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Lao People's Democratic Republic
0.0012 units per square kilometre
in 2023
India rank
5th
Lao People's Democratic Republic rank
6th

Diphtheria - number of reported cases, per square kilometre over time

  • India
  • Lao People's Democratic Republic
00.0050.010.015197419982023

How they compare

India currently reports 0.0013 units per square kilometre against 0.0012 units per square kilometre in Lao People's Democratic Republic, a difference of 0.0001 units per square kilometre.

That makes India's figure about 1.1 times Lao People's Democratic Republic's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 48 shared years of data; in 1974 it was India ahead.

India ranks 5th and Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 6th of 204 countries.

India has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade India Lao People's Democratic Republic Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0087 units per square kilometre 0.0001 units per square kilometre 0.0086 units per square kilometre India
1980s 0.0057 units per square kilometre 0.0006 units per square kilometre 0.0051 units per square kilometre India
1990s 0.0016 units per square kilometre 0.0002 units per square kilometre 0.0014 units per square kilometre India
2000s 0.0016 units per square kilometre 0.0001 units per square kilometre 0.0016 units per square kilometre India
2010s 0.0016 units per square kilometre 0.0002 units per square kilometre 0.0014 units per square kilometre India
2020s 0.001 units per square kilometre 0.0003 units per square kilometre 0.0007 units per square kilometre India

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher diphtheria - number of reported cases, per square kilometre, India or Lao People's Democratic Republic?
India, at 0.0013 units per square kilometre against 0.0012 units per square kilometre in Lao People's Democratic Republic as of 2023.
What is the difference in diphtheria - number of reported cases, per square kilometre between India and Lao People's Democratic Republic?
0.0001 units per square kilometre, with India ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for India and Lao People's Democratic Republic?
48 years are reported by both, from 1974 to 2023.
How do India and Lao People's Democratic Republic rank globally for diphtheria - number of reported cases, per square kilometre?
India ranks 5th and Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 6th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Diphtheria - number of reported cases, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

India vs Lao People's Democratic Republic: Diphtheria - number of reported cases, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/diphtheria-number-of-reported-cases-per-square-kilometre/india/lao-pdr/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/diphtheria-number-of-reported-cases-per-square-kilometre/india/lao-pdr/">India vs Lao People's Democratic Republic: Diphtheria - number of reported cases, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Diphtheria - number of reported cases, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
205 places, 7,917 data points, 1974–2023
Last refreshed

Diphtheria - number of reported cases divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.