Japan vs Malawi: Diphtheria - number of reported cases, annual growth rate
Japan
-100 % change on previous year
in 2002
Malawi
-100 % change on previous year
in 2015
Japan rank
51st
Malawi rank
51st
Diphtheria - number of reported cases, annual growth rate over time
- Japan
- Malawi
How they compare
Japan currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Malawi, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 8 shared years of data; in 1977 it was Japan ahead.
Japan ranks 51st and Malawi ranks 51st of 140 countries.
Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 26.13 % change on previous year | 71.75 % change on previous year | 45.62 % change on previous year | Malawi |
| 1980s | -36.61 % change on previous year | 77.56 % change on previous year | 114.17 % change on previous year | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher diphtheria - number of reported cases, annual growth rate, Japan or Malawi?
- Japan, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Malawi as of 2002.
- What is the difference in diphtheria - number of reported cases, annual growth rate between Japan and Malawi?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Malawi?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 1984.
- How do Japan and Malawi rank globally for diphtheria - number of reported cases, annual growth rate?
- Japan ranks 51st and Malawi ranks 51st of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Diphtheria - number of reported cases, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Diphtheria - number of reported cases. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.