Cuba vs Rwanda: Diphtheria - number of reported cases, annual growth rate
Cuba
-100 % change on previous year
in 1980
Rwanda
-92.86 % change on previous year
in 1991
Cuba rank
51st
Rwanda rank
48th
Diphtheria - number of reported cases, annual growth rate over time
- Cuba
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports -92.86 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Cuba, a difference of 7.14 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 1976 it was Rwanda ahead.
Cuba ranks 51st and Rwanda ranks 48th of 140 countries.
Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0 % change on previous year | 383.33 % change on previous year | 383.33 % change on previous year | Rwanda |
| 1980s | -100 % change on previous year | -85.71 % change on previous year | 14.29 % change on previous year | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher diphtheria - number of reported cases, annual growth rate, Cuba or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at -92.86 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Cuba as of 1991.
- What is the difference in diphtheria - number of reported cases, annual growth rate between Cuba and Rwanda?
- 7.14 % change on previous year, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Rwanda?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 1980.
- How do Cuba and Rwanda rank globally for diphtheria - number of reported cases, annual growth rate?
- Cuba ranks 51st and Rwanda ranks 48th of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Diphtheria - number of reported cases, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Diphtheria - number of reported cases. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.