Cuba vs Ecuador: Diphtheria - number of reported cases, annual growth rate
Cuba
-100 % change on previous year
in 1980
Ecuador
-100 % change on previous year
in 2025
Cuba rank
51st
Ecuador rank
51st
Diphtheria - number of reported cases, annual growth rate over time
- Cuba
- Ecuador
How they compare
Cuba currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Ecuador, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 1976 it was Ecuador ahead.
Cuba ranks 51st and Ecuador ranks 51st of 140 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 1 and Ecuador in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Ecuador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0 % change on previous year | -8.96 % change on previous year | 8.96 % change on previous year | Cuba |
| 1980s | -100 % change on previous year | -33.33 % change on previous year | 66.67 % change on previous year | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher diphtheria - number of reported cases, annual growth rate, Cuba or Ecuador?
- Cuba, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Ecuador as of 1980.
- What is the difference in diphtheria - number of reported cases, annual growth rate between Cuba and Ecuador?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Ecuador?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 1980.
- How do Cuba and Ecuador rank globally for diphtheria - number of reported cases, annual growth rate?
- Cuba ranks 51st and Ecuador ranks 51st of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Diphtheria - number of reported cases, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Diphtheria - number of reported cases. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.