Congo vs Japan: Diphtheria - number of reported cases, annual growth rate
Congo
-100 % change on previous year
in 2013
Japan
-100 % change on previous year
in 2002
Congo rank
51st
Japan rank
51st
Diphtheria - number of reported cases, annual growth rate over time
- Congo
- Japan
How they compare
Congo currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Japan, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Japan ahead.
Congo ranks 51st and Japan ranks 51st of 140 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Japan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | -40 % change on previous year | 26.62 % change on previous year | 66.62 % change on previous year | Japan |
| 1980s | -16.67 % change on previous year | -41.57 % change on previous year | 24.9 % change on previous year | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher diphtheria - number of reported cases, annual growth rate, Congo or Japan?
- Congo, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Japan as of 2013.
- What is the difference in diphtheria - number of reported cases, annual growth rate between Congo and Japan?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Japan?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 1982.
- How do Congo and Japan rank globally for diphtheria - number of reported cases, annual growth rate?
- Congo ranks 51st and Japan ranks 51st of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Diphtheria - number of reported cases, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Diphtheria - number of reported cases. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.