Sri Lanka vs Western Sahara: Death rate in armed conflicts based on where they occurred

Sri Lanka
0 deaths per 100,000 people
in 2025
Western Sahara
0 deaths per 100,000 people
in 2025
Sri Lanka rank
55th
Western Sahara rank
55th

Death rate in armed conflicts based on where they occurred over time

  • Sri Lanka
  • Western Sahara
0255075100125198920072025

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports 0 deaths per 100,000 people against 0 deaths per 100,000 people in Western Sahara, a difference of 0 deaths per 100,000 people.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 37 shared years of data; in 1989 it was Western Sahara ahead.

Sri Lanka ranks 55th and Western Sahara ranks 55th of 196 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Sri Lanka averaged higher in 3 and Western Sahara in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sri Lanka Western Sahara Difference Ahead
1980s 7.93 deaths per 100,000 people 119.01 deaths per 100,000 people 111.08 deaths per 100,000 people Western Sahara
1990s 21.03 deaths per 100,000 people 0 deaths per 100,000 people 21.03 deaths per 100,000 people Sri Lanka
2000s 13.42 deaths per 100,000 people 0 deaths per 100,000 people 13.42 deaths per 100,000 people Sri Lanka
2010s 0.1138 deaths per 100,000 people 0 deaths per 100,000 people 0.1138 deaths per 100,000 people Sri Lanka
2020s 0 deaths per 100,000 people 0 deaths per 100,000 people 0 deaths per 100,000 people

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher death rate in armed conflicts based on where they occurred, Sri Lanka or Western Sahara?
Sri Lanka, at 0 deaths per 100,000 people against 0 deaths per 100,000 people in Western Sahara as of 2025.
What is the difference in death rate in armed conflicts based on where they occurred between Sri Lanka and Western Sahara?
0 deaths per 100,000 people, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Western Sahara?
37 years are reported by both, from 1989 to 2025.
How do Sri Lanka and Western Sahara rank globally for death rate in armed conflicts based on where they occurred?
Sri Lanka ranks 55th and Western Sahara ranks 55th of 196 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Uppsala Conflict Data Program (2026); geoBoundaries (2023); Population based on various sources (2024) – with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Death rate in armed conflicts based on where they occurred. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sri Lanka vs Western Sahara: Death rate in armed conflicts based on where they occurred. Statizoid, drawing on Uppsala Conflict Data Program (2026); geoBoundaries (2023); Population based on various sources (2024) – with minor processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/death-rate-in-armed-conflicts/sri-lanka/western-sahara/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/death-rate-in-armed-conflicts/sri-lanka/western-sahara/">Sri Lanka vs Western Sahara: Death rate in armed conflicts based on where they occurred</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Death rate in armed conflicts based on where they occurred
Unit
deaths per 100,000 people
Source
Uppsala Conflict Data Program (2026); geoBoundaries (2023); Population based on various sources (2024) – with minor processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
196 places, 7,252 data points, 1989–2025
Last refreshed

Best estimate of the number of deaths of combatants and civilians due to fighting in interstate, intrastate, extrasystemic, non-state conflicts, and one-sided violence that were ongoing that year.