Small states vs South Sudan: Current health expenditure
Current health expenditure over time
- Small states
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 11.6% against 6.8% in Small states, a difference of 4.8%.
That makes South Sudan's figure about 1.7 times Small states's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2017 it was South Sudan ahead.
Small states ranks 15th and South Sudan ranks 12th of 47 groups.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Small states | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 6.4% | 14.3% | 7.9% | South Sudan |
| 2020s | 7.1% | 8.5% | 1.4% | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher current health expenditure, Small states or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 11.6% against 6.8% in Small states as of 2023.
- What is the difference in current health expenditure between Small states and South Sudan?
- 4.8%, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Small states and South Sudan?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2023.
- How do Small states and South Sudan rank globally for current health expenditure?
- Small states ranks 15th and South Sudan ranks 12th of 47 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Health Expenditure Database, updated December 12th, 2025, World Health Organization (WHO), published as Current health expenditure (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Level of current health expenditure expressed as a percentage of GDP. Estimates of current health expenditures include healthcare goods and services consumed during each year. This indicator does not include capital health expenditures such as buildings, machinery, IT and stocks of vaccines for emergency or outbreaks.