Equatorial Guinea vs Palestine: Current health expenditure per capita, PPP (current international $)

Equatorial Guinea
609.3 current international $
in 2023
Palestine
604.44 current international $
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea rank
123rd
Palestine rank
125th

Current health expenditure per capita, PPP (current international $) over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Palestine
0200400600200020112023

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 609.3 current international $ against 604.44 current international $ in Palestine, a difference of 4.86 current international $.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Palestine ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 123rd and Palestine ranks 125th of 193 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Palestine in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Palestine Difference Ahead
2000s 334.72 current international $ 286.12 current international $ 48.61 current international $ Equatorial Guinea
2010s 494.59 current international $ 495.63 current international $ 1.04 current international $ Palestine
2020s 555.32 current international $ 578.52 current international $ 23.19 current international $ Palestine

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher current health expenditure per capita, ppp, Equatorial Guinea or Palestine?
Equatorial Guinea, at 609.3 current international $ against 604.44 current international $ in Palestine as of 2023.
What is the difference in current health expenditure per capita, ppp between Equatorial Guinea and Palestine?
4.86 current international $, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Palestine?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Palestine rank globally for current health expenditure per capita, ppp?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 123rd and Palestine ranks 125th of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Global Health Expenditure Database, updated December 12th, 2025, World Health Organization (WHO), published as Current health expenditure per capita, PPP (current international $). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Palestine: Current health expenditure per capita, PPP. Statizoid, drawing on Global Health Expenditure Database, updated December 12th, 2025, World Health Organization (WHO). Retrieved 12 November 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/current-health-expenditure-per-capita-ppp-current-international/equatorial-guinea/west-bank-and-gaza/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/current-health-expenditure-per-capita-ppp-current-international/equatorial-guinea/west-bank-and-gaza/">Equatorial Guinea vs Palestine: Current health expenditure per capita, PPP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Current health expenditure per capita, PPP (current international $)
Unit
current international $
Source
Global Health Expenditure Database, updated December 12th, 2025, World Health Organization (WHO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
240 places, 5,691 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

Current expenditures on health per capita expressed in international dollars at purchasing power parity.