Australia vs Zambia: Congenital Rubella Syndrome - number of reported cases
Australia
0
in 2025
Zambia
0
in 2017
Australia rank
16th
Zambia rank
16th
Congenital Rubella Syndrome - number of reported cases over time
- Australia
- Zambia
How they compare
Australia currently reports 0 against 0 in Zambia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 16th and Zambia ranks 16th of 187 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 1 and Zambia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Australia |
| 2010s | 0.5 | 1.62 | 1.12 | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher congenital rubella syndrome - number of reported cases, Australia or Zambia?
- Australia, at 0 against 0 in Zambia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in congenital rubella syndrome - number of reported cases between Australia and Zambia?
- 0, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Zambia?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2017.
- How do Australia and Zambia rank globally for congenital rubella syndrome - number of reported cases?
- Australia ranks 16th and Zambia ranks 16th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Congenital Rubella Syndrome - number of reported cases. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.