Australia vs Namibia: Congenital Rubella Syndrome - number of reported cases
Australia
0
in 2025
Namibia
1
in 2024
Australia rank
16th
Namibia rank
13th
Congenital Rubella Syndrome - number of reported cases over time
- Australia
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 1 against 0 in Australia, a difference of 1.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 16th and Namibia ranks 13th of 187 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 2 and Namibia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Australia |
| 2010s | 0.2 | 0 | 0.2 | Australia |
| 2020s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher congenital rubella syndrome - number of reported cases, Australia or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 1 against 0 in Australia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in congenital rubella syndrome - number of reported cases between Australia and Namibia?
- 1, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Namibia?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2024.
- How do Australia and Namibia rank globally for congenital rubella syndrome - number of reported cases?
- Australia ranks 16th and Namibia ranks 13th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Congenital Rubella Syndrome - number of reported cases. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.