Australia vs Costa Rica: Congenital Rubella Syndrome - number of reported cases
Australia
0
in 2025
Costa Rica
0
in 2025
Australia rank
16th
Costa Rica rank
16th
Congenital Rubella Syndrome - number of reported cases over time
- Australia
- Costa Rica
How they compare
Australia currently reports 0 against 0 in Costa Rica, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 16th and Costa Rica ranks 16th of 187 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Costa Rica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Australia |
| 2010s | 0.4 | 0 | 0.4 | Australia |
| 2020s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher congenital rubella syndrome - number of reported cases, Australia or Costa Rica?
- Australia, at 0 against 0 in Costa Rica as of 2025.
- What is the difference in congenital rubella syndrome - number of reported cases between Australia and Costa Rica?
- 0, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Costa Rica?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2025.
- How do Australia and Costa Rica rank globally for congenital rubella syndrome - number of reported cases?
- Australia ranks 16th and Costa Rica ranks 16th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Congenital Rubella Syndrome - number of reported cases. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.