Australia vs Canada: Congenital Rubella Syndrome - number of reported cases
Australia
0
in 2025
Canada
0
in 2025
Australia rank
16th
Canada rank
16th
Congenital Rubella Syndrome - number of reported cases over time
- Australia
- Canada
How they compare
Australia currently reports 0 against 0 in Canada, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Canada ahead.
Australia ranks 16th and Canada ranks 16th of 187 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 2 and Canada in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Canada | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1 | 0.8571 | 0.1429 | Australia |
| 2010s | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.2 | Australia |
| 2020s | 0 | 0.25 | 0.25 | Canada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher congenital rubella syndrome - number of reported cases, Australia or Canada?
- Australia, at 0 against 0 in Canada as of 2025.
- What is the difference in congenital rubella syndrome - number of reported cases between Australia and Canada?
- 0, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Canada?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2025.
- How do Australia and Canada rank globally for congenital rubella syndrome - number of reported cases?
- Australia ranks 16th and Canada ranks 16th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Congenital Rubella Syndrome - number of reported cases. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.