Americas (WHO region) vs Namibia: Congenital Rubella Syndrome - number of reported cases
Americas (WHO region)
0
in 2025
Namibia
1
in 2024
Americas (WHO region) rank
11th
Namibia rank
13th
Congenital Rubella Syndrome - number of reported cases over time
- Americas (WHO region)
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 1 against 0 in Americas (WHO region), a difference of 1.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Americas (WHO region) ahead.
Americas (WHO region) ranks 11th and Namibia ranks 13th of 11 groups.
Across the 3 decades both report, Americas (WHO region) averaged higher in 2 and Namibia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Americas (WHO region) | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 74 | 0 | 74 | Americas (WHO region) |
| 2010s | 0.6 | 0 | 0.6 | Americas (WHO region) |
| 2020s | 0.5 | 1 | 0.5 | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher congenital rubella syndrome - number of reported cases, Americas (WHO region) or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 1 against 0 in Americas (WHO region) as of 2024.
- What is the difference in congenital rubella syndrome - number of reported cases between Americas (WHO region) and Namibia?
- 1, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Americas (WHO region) and Namibia?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2024.
- How do Americas (WHO region) and Namibia rank globally for congenital rubella syndrome - number of reported cases?
- Americas (WHO region) ranks 11th and Namibia ranks 13th of 11 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Congenital Rubella Syndrome - number of reported cases. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.