New Zealand vs Sri Lanka: Confirmed cases of MDR-TB
New Zealand
4
in 2012
Sri Lanka
5
in 2012
New Zealand rank
105th
Sri Lanka rank
102nd
Confirmed cases of MDR-TB over time
- New Zealand
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 5 against 4 in New Zealand, a difference of 1.
That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 1.2 times New Zealand's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
New Zealand ranks 105th and Sri Lanka ranks 102nd of 145 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.8 | 13.6 | 10.8 | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 3.33 | 9.67 | 6.33 | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher confirmed cases of mdr-tb, New Zealand or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 5 against 4 in New Zealand as of 2012.
- What is the difference in confirmed cases of mdr-tb between New Zealand and Sri Lanka?
- 1, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Sri Lanka?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2012.
- How do New Zealand and Sri Lanka rank globally for confirmed cases of mdr-tb?
- New Zealand ranks 105th and Sri Lanka ranks 102nd of 145 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Confirmed cases of MDR-TB. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.