Rwanda vs Sri Lanka: Confirmed cases of MDR-TB started treatment for MDR-TB
Rwanda
100.0%
in 2012
Sri Lanka
100.0%
in 2012
Rwanda rank
3rd
Sri Lanka rank
3rd
Confirmed cases of MDR-TB started treatment for MDR-TB over time
- Rwanda
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Rwanda ahead.
Rwanda ranks 3rd and Sri Lanka ranks 3rd of 54 countries.
Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 90.0% | 81.5% | 8.5% | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 97.7% | 71.0% | 26.7% | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher confirmed cases of mdr-tb started treatment for mdr-tb, Rwanda or Sri Lanka?
- Rwanda, at 100.0% against 100.0% in Sri Lanka as of 2012.
- What is the difference in confirmed cases of mdr-tb started treatment for mdr-tb between Rwanda and Sri Lanka?
- 0.0%, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Sri Lanka?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2012.
- How do Rwanda and Sri Lanka rank globally for confirmed cases of mdr-tb started treatment for mdr-tb?
- Rwanda ranks 3rd and Sri Lanka ranks 3rd of 54 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Confirmed cases of MDR-TB started treatment for MDR-TB (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.