Peru vs Rwanda: Confirmed cases of MDR-TB started treatment for MDR-TB
Peru
100.0%
in 2012
Rwanda
100.0%
in 2012
Peru rank
3rd
Rwanda rank
3rd
Confirmed cases of MDR-TB started treatment for MDR-TB over time
- Peru
- Rwanda
How they compare
Peru currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in Rwanda, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Peru ahead.
Peru ranks 3rd and Rwanda ranks 3rd of 54 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Peru averaged higher in 1 and Rwanda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 108.0% | 90.0% | 18.0% | Peru |
| 2010s | 90.0% | 97.7% | 7.7% | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher confirmed cases of mdr-tb started treatment for mdr-tb, Peru or Rwanda?
- Peru, at 100.0% against 100.0% in Rwanda as of 2012.
- What is the difference in confirmed cases of mdr-tb started treatment for mdr-tb between Peru and Rwanda?
- 0.0%, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Rwanda?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2012.
- How do Peru and Rwanda rank globally for confirmed cases of mdr-tb started treatment for mdr-tb?
- Peru ranks 3rd and Rwanda ranks 3rd of 54 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Confirmed cases of MDR-TB started treatment for MDR-TB (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.