Namibia vs Rwanda: Confirmed cases of MDR-TB started treatment for MDR-TB
Namibia
100.0%
in 2012
Rwanda
100.0%
in 2012
Namibia rank
3rd
Rwanda rank
3rd
Confirmed cases of MDR-TB started treatment for MDR-TB over time
- Namibia
- Rwanda
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in Rwanda, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Namibia ahead.
Namibia ranks 3rd and Rwanda ranks 3rd of 54 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 98.5% | 90.0% | 8.5% | Namibia |
| 2010s | 100.0% | 97.7% | 2.3% | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher confirmed cases of mdr-tb started treatment for mdr-tb, Namibia or Rwanda?
- Namibia, at 100.0% against 100.0% in Rwanda as of 2012.
- What is the difference in confirmed cases of mdr-tb started treatment for mdr-tb between Namibia and Rwanda?
- 0.0%, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Rwanda?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2012.
- How do Namibia and Rwanda rank globally for confirmed cases of mdr-tb started treatment for mdr-tb?
- Namibia ranks 3rd and Rwanda ranks 3rd of 54 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Confirmed cases of MDR-TB started treatment for MDR-TB (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.