Mali vs Western Pacific (WHO region): Confirmed cases of MDR-TB started treatment for MDR-TB
Mali
100.0%
in 2012
Western Pacific (WHO region)
73.0%
in 2012
Mali rank
3rd
Western Pacific (WHO region) rank
6th
Confirmed cases of MDR-TB started treatment for MDR-TB over time
- Mali
- Western Pacific (WHO region)
How they compare
Mali currently reports 100.0% against 73.0% in Western Pacific (WHO region), a difference of 27.0%.
That makes Mali's figure about 1.4 times Western Pacific (WHO region)'s.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Mali ahead.
Mali ranks 3rd and Western Pacific (WHO region) ranks 6th of 54 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Mali averaged higher in 1 and Western Pacific (WHO region) in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mali | Western Pacific (WHO region) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 50.0% | 58.5% | 8.5% | Western Pacific (WHO region) |
| 2010s | 100.0% | 61.7% | 38.3% | Mali |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher confirmed cases of mdr-tb started treatment for mdr-tb, Mali or Western Pacific (WHO region)?
- Mali, at 100.0% against 73.0% in Western Pacific (WHO region) as of 2012.
- What is the difference in confirmed cases of mdr-tb started treatment for mdr-tb between Mali and Western Pacific (WHO region)?
- 27.0%, with Mali ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Western Pacific (WHO region)?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2012.
- How do Mali and Western Pacific (WHO region) rank globally for confirmed cases of mdr-tb started treatment for mdr-tb?
- Mali ranks 3rd and Western Pacific (WHO region) ranks 6th of 54 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Confirmed cases of MDR-TB started treatment for MDR-TB (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.