High income (World Bank) vs Namibia: Confirmed cases of MDR-TB started treatment for MDR-TB
High income (World Bank)
130.0%
in 2012
Namibia
100.0%
in 2012
High income (World Bank) rank
1st
Namibia rank
3rd
Confirmed cases of MDR-TB started treatment for MDR-TB over time
- High income (World Bank)
- Namibia
How they compare
High income (World Bank) currently reports 130.0% against 100.0% in Namibia, a difference of 30.0%.
That makes High income (World Bank)'s figure about 1.3 times Namibia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Namibia ahead.
High income (World Bank) ranks 1st and Namibia ranks 3rd of 10 groups.
Across the 2 decades both report, High income (World Bank) averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | High income (World Bank) | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 29.2% | 98.5% | 69.2% | Namibia |
| 2010s | 119.0% | 100.0% | 19.0% | High income (World Bank) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher confirmed cases of mdr-tb started treatment for mdr-tb, High income (World Bank) or Namibia?
- High income (World Bank), at 130.0% against 100.0% in Namibia as of 2012.
- What is the difference in confirmed cases of mdr-tb started treatment for mdr-tb between High income (World Bank) and Namibia?
- 30.0%, with High income (World Bank) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for High income (World Bank) and Namibia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2012.
- How do High income (World Bank) and Namibia rank globally for confirmed cases of mdr-tb started treatment for mdr-tb?
- High income (World Bank) ranks 1st and Namibia ranks 3rd of 10 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Confirmed cases of MDR-TB started treatment for MDR-TB (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.