Sri Lanka vs Suriname: Cardiovascular death rate vs gdp per capita
Sri Lanka
179.22
in 2021
Suriname
178.29
in 2021
Sri Lanka rank
135th
Suriname rank
136th
Cardiovascular death rate vs gdp per capita over time
- Sri Lanka
- Suriname
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 179.22 against 178.29 in Suriname, a difference of 0.93.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Sri Lanka ranks 135th and Suriname ranks 136th of 194 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Sri Lanka averaged higher in 2 and Suriname in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sri Lanka | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 305.53 | 269.09 | 36.44 | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 233.16 | 225.28 | 7.89 | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 162.87 | 200.78 | 37.91 | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cardiovascular death rate vs gdp per capita, Sri Lanka or Suriname?
- Sri Lanka, at 179.22 against 178.29 in Suriname as of 2021.
- What is the difference in cardiovascular death rate vs gdp per capita between Sri Lanka and Suriname?
- 0.93, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Suriname?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
- How do Sri Lanka and Suriname rank globally for cardiovascular death rate vs gdp per capita?
- Sri Lanka ranks 135th and Suriname ranks 136th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Cardiovascular death rate vs gdp per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.