Georgia vs Namibia: Capital health expenditure
Georgia
0.0%
in 2019
Namibia
0.0%
in 2022
Georgia rank
121st
Namibia rank
119th
Capital health expenditure over time
- Georgia
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Georgia, a difference of 0.0%.
That makes Namibia's figure about 1.1 times Georgia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Georgia ahead.
Georgia ranks 121st and Namibia ranks 119th of 128 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.2% | Georgia |
| 2010s | 0.3% | 0.3% | 0.0% | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher capital health expenditure, Georgia or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Georgia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in capital health expenditure between Georgia and Namibia?
- 0.0%, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Namibia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Georgia and Namibia rank globally for capital health expenditure?
- Georgia ranks 121st and Namibia ranks 119th of 128 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization Global Health Expenditure database (http://apps.who.int/nha/database). The data was retrieved on April 7, 2023, published as Capital health expenditure (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Level of capital investments on health expressed as a percentage of GDP. Capital health investments include health infrastructure (buildings, machinery, IT) and stocks of vaccines for emergency or outbreaks.