Latvia vs WPR: BCG immunization coverage among 1-year-olds (%)
Latvia
99.0%
in 2025
WPR
92.0%
in 2025
Latvia rank
1st
WPR rank
3rd
BCG immunization coverage among 1-year-olds (%) over time
- Latvia
- WPR
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 99.0% against 92.0% in WPR, a difference of 7.0%.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times WPR's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 1st and WPR ranks 3rd of 164 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 2 and WPR in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | WPR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 97.0% | 88.5% | 8.5% | Latvia |
| 2010s | 94.1% | 95.9% | 1.8% | WPR |
| 2020s | 98.3% | 93.3% | 5.0% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bcg immunization coverage among 1-year-olds (%), Latvia or WPR?
- Latvia, at 99.0% against 92.0% in WPR as of 2025.
- What is the difference in bcg immunization coverage among 1-year-olds (%) between Latvia and WPR?
- 7.0%, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and WPR?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Latvia and WPR rank globally for bcg immunization coverage among 1-year-olds (%)?
- Latvia ranks 1st and WPR ranks 3rd of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as BCG immunization coverage among 1-year-olds (%) (WUENIC). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.