High income (World Bank) vs Naoero: BCG immunization coverage among 1-year-olds (%)
High income (World Bank)
96.0%
in 2025
Naoero
99.0%
in 2025
High income (World Bank) rank
1st
Naoero rank
1st
BCG immunization coverage among 1-year-olds (%) over time
- High income (World Bank)
- Naoero
How they compare
Naoero currently reports 99.0% against 96.0% in High income (World Bank), a difference of 3.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Naoero ahead.
High income (World Bank) ranks 1st and Naoero ranks 1st of 17 groups.
Naoero has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | High income (World Bank) | Naoero | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 92.1% | 96.7% | 4.6% | Naoero |
| 2010s | 93.8% | 99.0% | 5.2% | Naoero |
| 2020s | 95.5% | 99.0% | 3.5% | Naoero |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bcg immunization coverage among 1-year-olds (%), High income (World Bank) or Naoero?
- Naoero, at 99.0% against 96.0% in High income (World Bank) as of 2025.
- What is the difference in bcg immunization coverage among 1-year-olds (%) between High income (World Bank) and Naoero?
- 3.0%, with Naoero ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for High income (World Bank) and Naoero?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do High income (World Bank) and Naoero rank globally for bcg immunization coverage among 1-year-olds (%)?
- High income (World Bank) ranks 1st and Naoero ranks 1st of 17 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as BCG immunization coverage among 1-year-olds (%) (WUENIC). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.