New Zealand vs Thailand: Average of 13 International Health Regulations core capacity scores
New Zealand
98.23
in 2017
Thailand
97.07
in 2017
New Zealand rank
12th
Thailand rank
15th
Average of 13 International Health Regulations core capacity scores over time
- New Zealand
- Thailand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 98.23 against 97.07 in Thailand, a difference of 1.16.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2010 it was New Zealand ahead.
New Zealand ranks 12th and Thailand ranks 15th of 145 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average of 13 international health regulations core capacity scores, New Zealand or Thailand?
- New Zealand, at 98.23 against 97.07 in Thailand as of 2017.
- What is the difference in average of 13 international health regulations core capacity scores between New Zealand and Thailand?
- 1.16, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Thailand?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2017.
- How do New Zealand and Thailand rank globally for average of 13 international health regulations core capacity scores?
- New Zealand ranks 12th and Thailand ranks 15th of 145 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Average of 13 International Health Regulations core capacity scores. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.