New Zealand vs Saudi Arabia: Average of 13 International Health Regulations core capacity scores
New Zealand
98.23
in 2017
Saudi Arabia
98.79
in 2017
New Zealand rank
12th
Saudi Arabia rank
11th
Average of 13 International Health Regulations core capacity scores over time
- New Zealand
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Saudi Arabia currently reports 98.79 against 98.23 in New Zealand, a difference of 0.56.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Saudi Arabia ahead.
New Zealand ranks 12th and Saudi Arabia ranks 11th of 145 countries.
Saudi Arabia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average of 13 international health regulations core capacity scores, New Zealand or Saudi Arabia?
- Saudi Arabia, at 98.79 against 98.23 in New Zealand as of 2017.
- What is the difference in average of 13 international health regulations core capacity scores between New Zealand and Saudi Arabia?
- 0.56, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Saudi Arabia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2017.
- How do New Zealand and Saudi Arabia rank globally for average of 13 international health regulations core capacity scores?
- New Zealand ranks 12th and Saudi Arabia ranks 11th of 145 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Average of 13 International Health Regulations core capacity scores. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.