Malaysia vs Sur: Average of 13 International Health Regulations core capacity scores
Malaysia
100
in 2016
Sur
71
in 2017
Malaysia rank
1st
Sur rank
1st
Average of 13 International Health Regulations core capacity scores over time
- Malaysia
- Sur
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 100 against 71 in Sur, a difference of 29.
That makes Malaysia's figure about 1.4 times Sur's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Malaysia has been ahead every year.
Malaysia ranks 1st and Sur ranks 1st of 145 countries.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average of 13 international health regulations core capacity scores, Malaysia or Sur?
- Malaysia, at 100 against 71 in Sur as of 2016.
- What is the difference in average of 13 international health regulations core capacity scores between Malaysia and Sur?
- 29, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Sur?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2016.
- How do Malaysia and Sur rank globally for average of 13 international health regulations core capacity scores?
- Malaysia ranks 1st and Sur ranks 1st of 145 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Average of 13 International Health Regulations core capacity scores. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.