South Korea vs New Zealand: Average of 13 International Health Regulations core capacity scores
South Korea
97.9
in 2017
New Zealand
98.23
in 2017
South Korea rank
14th
New Zealand rank
12th
Average of 13 International Health Regulations core capacity scores over time
- South Korea
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 98.23 against 97.9 in South Korea, a difference of 0.33.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2010 it was New Zealand ahead.
South Korea ranks 14th and New Zealand ranks 12th of 145 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average of 13 international health regulations core capacity scores, South Korea or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 98.23 against 97.9 in South Korea as of 2017.
- What is the difference in average of 13 international health regulations core capacity scores between South Korea and New Zealand?
- 0.33, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Korea and New Zealand?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2017.
- How do South Korea and New Zealand rank globally for average of 13 international health regulations core capacity scores?
- South Korea ranks 14th and New Zealand ranks 12th of 145 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Average of 13 International Health Regulations core capacity scores. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.