Cuba vs New Zealand: Average of 13 International Health Regulations core capacity scores
Cuba
99.3
in 2017
New Zealand
98.23
in 2017
Cuba rank
9th
New Zealand rank
12th
Average of 13 International Health Regulations core capacity scores over time
- Cuba
- New Zealand
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 99.3 against 98.23 in New Zealand, a difference of 1.07.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2011 it was New Zealand ahead.
Cuba ranks 9th and New Zealand ranks 12th of 145 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average of 13 international health regulations core capacity scores, Cuba or New Zealand?
- Cuba, at 99.3 against 98.23 in New Zealand as of 2017.
- What is the difference in average of 13 international health regulations core capacity scores between Cuba and New Zealand?
- 1.07, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and New Zealand?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2017.
- How do Cuba and New Zealand rank globally for average of 13 international health regulations core capacity scores?
- Cuba ranks 9th and New Zealand ranks 12th of 145 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Average of 13 International Health Regulations core capacity scores. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.