Costa Rica vs Micronesia, Federated States of: Average of 13 International Health Regulations core capacity scores
Costa Rica
87.16
in 2017
Micronesia, Federated States of
85.78
in 2017
Costa Rica rank
50th
Micronesia, Federated States of rank
53rd
Average of 13 International Health Regulations core capacity scores over time
- Costa Rica
- Micronesia, Federated States of
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 87.16 against 85.78 in Micronesia, Federated States of, a difference of 1.38.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 50th and Micronesia, Federated States of ranks 53rd of 145 countries.
Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average of 13 international health regulations core capacity scores, Costa Rica or Micronesia, Federated States of?
- Costa Rica, at 87.16 against 85.78 in Micronesia, Federated States of as of 2017.
- What is the difference in average of 13 international health regulations core capacity scores between Costa Rica and Micronesia, Federated States of?
- 1.38, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Micronesia, Federated States of?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2017.
- How do Costa Rica and Micronesia, Federated States of rank globally for average of 13 international health regulations core capacity scores?
- Costa Rica ranks 50th and Micronesia, Federated States of ranks 53rd of 145 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Average of 13 International Health Regulations core capacity scores. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.