China vs Mus: Average of 13 International Health Regulations core capacity scores
China
100
in 2017
Mus
70.73
in 2017
China rank
1st
Mus rank
2nd
Average of 13 International Health Regulations core capacity scores over time
- China
- Mus
How they compare
China currently reports 100 against 70.73 in Mus, a difference of 29.27.
That makes China's figure about 1.4 times Mus's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, China has been ahead every year.
China ranks 1st and Mus ranks 2nd of 145 countries.
China has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average of 13 international health regulations core capacity scores, China or Mus?
- China, at 100 against 70.73 in Mus as of 2017.
- What is the difference in average of 13 international health regulations core capacity scores between China and Mus?
- 29.27, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Mus?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2017.
- How do China and Mus rank globally for average of 13 international health regulations core capacity scores?
- China ranks 1st and Mus ranks 2nd of 145 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Average of 13 International Health Regulations core capacity scores. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.