Australia vs Japan: Average of 13 International Health Regulations core capacity scores
Australia
99.68
in 2017
Japan
99.57
in 2017
Australia rank
5th
Japan rank
6th
Average of 13 International Health Regulations core capacity scores over time
- Australia
- Japan
How they compare
Australia currently reports 99.68 against 99.57 in Japan, a difference of 0.11.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Japan ahead.
Australia ranks 5th and Japan ranks 6th of 145 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average of 13 international health regulations core capacity scores, Australia or Japan?
- Australia, at 99.68 against 99.57 in Japan as of 2017.
- What is the difference in average of 13 international health regulations core capacity scores between Australia and Japan?
- 0.11, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Japan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2017.
- How do Australia and Japan rank globally for average of 13 international health regulations core capacity scores?
- Australia ranks 5th and Japan ranks 6th of 145 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Average of 13 International Health Regulations core capacity scores. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.